At Intrepid, we have adopted these rules wholeheartedly into our investment process, with a slight adaptation for investing in corporate debt:
Specifically, our credit research is designed to ensure the companies we invest in can pay down our debt from existing cash flow or, at worst, can maintain themselves in an excellent financial position that will allow them to execute what we call a “no-drama” refinancing in order to pay us back at the maturity of our notes.
That means the analysis we do is centered around the business fundamentals of the company and its ability to generate consistent cash flow – very similar to the research one would do when looking to make a long-term stock investment.
We start by looking for opportunities where we believe a company can easily pay off the debt we own through cash flow generation over the remaining life of the bond.
You could call that “Plan A” and the vast majority of our positions over time fall into this bucket.
But what happens when Plan A doesn’t work? When a thesis of a “painless paydown” or a “no drama” refinancing doesn’t play out due to macro or company-specific issues?
That’s where Plan B comes in – the margin of safety.
The margin of safety is a concept created by the famous investor (Benjamin Graham) and further developed in one of the all-time classic investment books authored by Seth Klarman (Margin of Safety: Risk-averse Value Investing Strategies for the Thoughtful Investor).
The concept relies on making sure you invest in opportunities where if things go wrong (whether based on things you can’t control or your own analytical mistakes), the margin of safety you implement in your investment process increases the odds that you don’t violate Warren Buffett’s rules above.
It’s a framework we see applied to equity investing all the time, but rarely see mentioned in regards to fixed income.
However, the idea of a margin of safety – something that increases the odds of our money getting paid back on time – is a core part of our underwriting process.
Below is how we apply the concept when looking for credit ideas.
Ask any lending officer at a sleepy savings and loan bank, and they will tell you that the most important predictor of whether or not a loan gets paid back on time is the character of the borrower.
In our opinion, they are 100% correct.
As such, the first things we check for when determining our margin of safety are indicators such as:
The answers to these questions take a long time to truly understand, and that's why we often follow companies for years before investing in them.
But they provide key insights into what sort of margin of safety may exist if our investment in a company’s debt doesn’t follow “Plan A.” We obviously prefer management teams and Boards with a high degree of character that also:
On this topic, one of the strongest signals that a company can send that it is committed to paying us back on time is proving that it is willing to do so at the expense of its shareholders. For instance, when a company cuts its dividend in order to funnel more capital to debt repayment, that is something we value highly and certainly adds to our margin of safety.
Even better is when a company has shown the willingness to raise fresh capital through a secondary stock offering with the proceeds earmarked for reducing leverage or making a refinancing transaction feasible.
This sort of liquidity "lever," if the company is willing to pull it, is probably the most attractive margin of safety we can have as creditors.
However, there are other important liquidity levers that we look for when fulfilling our margin of safety research on a new idea.
There are too many potential liquidity levers to make a complete list here, but some of the more common ones we look for are described below. The key point to take away is that we want our companies to have as many liquidity options as possible to help them pay us back on time should we find ourselves in a “Plan B” situation.
As we do with the fundamentals of a company, we spend a lot of time separately researching and analyzing a company’s liquidity levers (including the company’s willingness to pull on them). We liken our approach to a kid looking for his gifts under the tree at Christmas: the more the merrier.
Finally, in addition to the role that incentives among the management team and Board of Directors have, other stakeholders’ motivations can, at times, influence the magnitude of our margin of safety – either positively or negatively.
In an ideal world, our corporate debt investments are all “Plan A” ideas. But since the world is far from ideal, it’s essential to think through “Plan B” and determine how well a borrower is prepared to fulfill their commitments if circumstances don’t proceed as hoped.
As we are always striving to follow Warren Buffett’s two rules above, the margin of safety on each and every one of our fixed-income holdings is an important factor in our research, analysis, and portfolio management decisions.
To discuss how a margin of safety can help buffer your fixed-income portfolio returns, contact our portfolio management team today.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.
The Funds’ investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses must be considered carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment company. Please read it carefully before investing. A hard copy of the prospectus can be requested by calling 866-996-FUND (3863).
Intrepid Capital Management Funds are distributed by Quasar Distributors, LLC.